Shapeshifting? 'Biblical' Phenomena & Why The 'Camera Is So Blurry All the Time, Man'"
"A 'Machine' that Can Look Into the Past..."
Strategic
Coordination of
Analytically-based
Long-Term
Angular thought &
Redirection
S.C.A.L.A.R
A very special thank-you to both Lewis and Christine for assisting and providing immensely important conceptual concepts for this particular article.
“Does a seed know which tree it will grow up to be? Can it choose?”
We begin with Lewis’ piece to this article…
Imagine as a child that we were all given a rose. A rose symbolises the information of the system we live in. The rose contains everything that we were taught, everything we know to be true.
A rose has within it, thorns, protruding from the sides. As a child, you were given this rose and immediately the sting from the thorns compelled you to let it go. Your parents, at the sight of your dismal of the rose, pick it back and force it into your hand. They tell you that you must never let it go, never drop it, you must always hold it tight. So you do as everyone else does, you go around holding your rose and overtime the sting from the thorns goes away. You have become almost numb to it. You just accept that that’s how it is. But on occasion, something beyond the rose coerces you to release your grip slightly. You loosen your hold on the rose and you notice how it feels. You notice the pain that comes from the slight removal of thorns from flesh. You feel the blood trickle down your arm. You then look at the encapsulating beauty of the rose petals, all the good things that these petals bring you, all the peace and all the comfort. You decide, as you always have, to enjoy the beauty of the rose in spite of the sting from the thorns. Over time, the rose has lost its ability to captivate you. Its beauty has faded and everything it once was seems irrelevant. We are now reaching a time in our society where no one wants to hold the rose. The beauty of the rose has lost its poignancy. We are at a stage where we are looking for a way beyond the grasp of the rose. However people do not want to leave their wounds open. They do not want to feel exposed or vulnerable. So they continue to hold onto it, even if that means suffering through the pain and discomfort that the thorns force you to endure should you choose to hold on. So how much longer are we going to just accept the sting, just accept the pain of the roses where the beauty of the rose is now seemingly non-existent. The hour is late in which we have allowed the rose to rid us of our sovereignty, of our power. Its comfort and beauty aren’t enough to allow the continuation of the abuse we accept on a day to day basis. We have been fighting and bickering amongst other selves, blaming everyone around for the discomfort and the pain of the rose. We point at everyone else, but ourselves. We blame people because of their race, or their beliefs, or their religion. We are all blaming each other whilst failing to take responsibility as individuals, which if we all did would mean we wouldn’t and couldn’t blame others. There would be no one to blame, for we wouldn’t have a rose that stings, but one that soothes. We would have people who, through their own introspection, have built a way that we would no longer feel the need to grab a hold of a rose, because they would see how backwards that was. They would see how all the things the rose provided, the comfort, the security, the familiarity, could all be replaced by something that not only doesn’t stab you, doesn’t harm you, but heals, soothes and helps. Health is wealth, after all.
So it has to be asked, who is giving us the rose? Due to the nature of the thorns, they are designed in such a way that dissuades you from pursuing certain areas in life. They are there to keep you in check, otherwise the pain becomes a lot more apparent. So why was it designed this way? Are there gloves that can be worn, so one doesn’t feel the sting from the thorns? If so, what was invented first, the gloves or the thorn? Does this, then, tell us that the person giving us the rose, created it so? An intelligent design with a specified purpose. The rose, it seems logical to estimate, is given by those with whom have worn the gloves.
We now elaborate on Lewis’ incredible piece with my (Dave’s) own addition and perspective to such…
I feel obliged to add, that we must, in following the great conceptual postulations that Lewis has made, address perhaps an even more underlying question which then becomes; what if the wearing of the gloves dictates the volume, sharpness, and potency of the thorns, and the thorns dictate the parameters to which one then wears the gloves and how such approach is taken after the gloves were put on?
From a central-perspective - and perhaps, stochastic approach - of what many have referred to as “the now”, one could potentially make the argument that both the gloves and the thorns don’t dictate anything, but rather, your presence in and of itself, and the intent of your conscious and sub-conscious thoughts during the entropic state of approach to both putting the gloves on and approaching the rose, dictate what both the rose and the gloves will do within the confines of your approach as a sovereign being, thereby permitting a heuristic conclusion that without you taking such an approach to begin with, the gloves were never put on, and the thorns never pricked you, and the rose was never given to you.
This then leads us to the topics covered in the headline of this particular article, and au contraire to what some may think, believe it or not, Lewis has already done just an absolutely outstanding job (in my humble opinion) of explaining the topics mentioned in the title… but how-so?
Let us use some images to further elaborate with our proposal here:
Let us envision for a moment, that the colours represented here on this haptically-oriented toy, depict that of space and time, respectively.
Let us now envision that you are standing on the colour red, in the very bottom left of the image, just above my (Dave’s) thumb. Suppose you begin to look on to the green strip, which in reality, we would refer to as being __(x)__ amount of distance away from where you are standing in the red quadrant.
Now suppose some type of energetic phenomena occurs within the green region, and what is being represented in this example and image respectively, are that of space and time coordinates in a static placement, being still and not moving as per our perception and/or point of view of things.
But then this happens…
The space and time coordinates have now changed…they have gone from being entirely flat, to now being curved, with an asymmetrical geometry encasing the outer and inner perimeters of the space-time coordinates, respectively.
The key question here is, what does this say about those observing from the red quadrant where nothing has changed locally in the red zone, but when looking outwards, clearly something has changed from your view now that there is some type of elevation in the spacetime metric (Einstein’s tensors for those interested in specifics), but has anything really changed for you, being in the red quadrant? Or has an external perception changed your thoughts on something external that you then interpret to then become a form of internalized processing in a variety of manners (neurologically, emotionally, etc) within yourself?
You chose to let the sudden change in space and time effect your thoughts and actions, nothing else. You gave yourself that permittivity to be effectuated, whether for better or worse.
Now, we are brought to the time-old “humans/people fear what they don’t understand" statement, and I would agree to a large extent within the context of the world we are currently living within. However, what if we did understand it? Ergo, in this case, the sudden spacetime metric alterations and perturbations (which is fancy talk for “shapeshifting reality” in layman terms) can be understood by the average person? Would we be so afraid anymore?
Let’s go one step further; what if we found out that by understanding what occurs with such a phenomena, entails an entire set of energetic interactions from a physics perspective that you could then relate to personally without needing to know any physics? Would that not just be another form of understanding physics by using examples that relate to you?
Suddenly, following this approach, things don’t become so “scary” anymore, do they? You begin to notice that you can tell yourself that the metric of space and time is changing, but it won’t effect you even if it begins to elevate near or below you as you stand on the red quadrant… because you now understand it - and to briefly play on the word “understand”, you are metaphorically and energetically standing below it, so you can control the elevation of space and time; with your standing below space and time being a metaphor/example of how you are the foundation. Without you, there is no space, no time, no rose, no thorns, no gloves, no chicken, no egg, etc. Now, let’s go one step further even more-so; what if by understanding such phenomena, you can then harness it? Make any part of space and time fluctuate, “shape-shift”, be perturbed, etc… however you desire?
In by doing so, you can then feel and see different points in space and time, highly akin to observing a movie/film projector but you control the film, and heck, can even get up from the theatre seat if you wish!
Others whom are observing your elevation to realize that you are the source, will claim to see “pixelations” when trying to film you with their cameras as you adjust the space-time metric, they will call you names, they will make fun of you… all because they are of the belief that what they are residing in is all there is, and such a belief would be true, by DEFINITION OF THEIR INTERNAL BELIEF, which then, like a vortex spiralling outwards, an external PROJECTION OUTWARDS TO SUPPORT THEIR INTERNAL PARAMETERS.
This is also what many have called manifestation. By believing in your ideas, and yourself, and then telling others as you go along your journey of life what you want to do with your life, you’d be surprised how avidly things begin to “lock-in” to place that you once thought were perhaps never-before possible.
See where we are going with this? ;)
Dave, Lewis & Christine.